Overall Rating: 5
0 out of 0 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| March 01, 2011 |
| Randolph A B. - Mount Airy, MD |
|
Weight was off a size 6.5 weighed 5g's even the said this ring was6.2 minimum |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
9 out of 11 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| August 27, 2013 |
| Alison R. - Weilerbach, Rheinland-Pfalz |
|
Wow, the pictures do not do this ring justice. This is a very bright ring, with a lighter tone of gold than expected, but it looks GREAT. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
4 out of 5 people found the following review helpful:
Rating:  |
| December 28, 2013 |
| dave g. - Salinas, CA |
|
It's very nice ring but too simple for my fiance's liking so we're exchanging this one for another cubic zirconia ring. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
5 out of 8 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| January 20, 2011 |
| Jasmine a - Richmond, VA |
|
Did not have any reason for originally buying this ring but I really liked how it looked and knew I would wear it. I like wider rings and how they look on my hands-thinner than I originally expected but it's ok b/c it makes it look less bulky and go well with evening wear. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
7 out of 19 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| January 25, 2011 |
| elizabeth f. - Elk Grove, CA |
|
For a stainless steel ring this has some shine. Great gift on a budget for my b/f. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}